# Delta-Wye Resistor Networks

Article by:
WARNING
This page is in notes format, and may not be of the same quality as other pages on this site.

## Overview

The following schematic shows the four common resistor network arrangements. Note that there is only two different connection topologies (those on the left, and those on the right), but there are two different ways of drawing each. The Delta network can be rearranged as the Pi network, and the Wye network rearranged as the Tee network.

NOTE

The Delta and Pi network is the same configuration, just drawn differently (as shown in the above diagram)! Same goes to the Wye and Tee.

With a few equations, you can transform a Delta network into a Wye network, and vise versa. These transformed networks are equivalent, i.e. from an outside observer who can only touch and measure the terminals $$A$$, $$B$$ and $$C$$, they wouldn’t be able to tell the difference. These transformations are useful for a number of reasons.

## Delta To Wye Transformation

You can convert a Delta network of resistors to an equivalent Wye network with the following equations:

\begin{align} R_A = \frac{R_{AB}R_{AC}}{R_{AB} + R_{AC} + R_{BC}} \\ R_B = \frac{R_{AB}R_{BC}}{R_{AB} + R_{AC} + R_{BC}} \\ R_C = \frac{R_{AC}R_{BC}}{R_{AB} + R_{AC} + R_{BC}} \\ \end{align}

## Wye To Delta Transformation

You can convert a Wye network of resistors to an equivalent Delta network with the following equations:

\begin{align} R_{AB} = \frac{R_A R_B + R_A R_C + R_B R_C}{R_C} \\ R_{AC} = \frac{R_A R_B + R_A R_C + R_B R_C}{R_B} \\ R_{BC} = \frac{R_A R_B + R_A R_C + R_B R_C}{R_A} \\ \end{align}

## Resistor Network Example

Let’s treat the top three resistors as a Delta network:

Let’s now convert this Delta network to a Wye network:

\begin{align} R_A &= \frac{R_{AB}R_{AC}}{R_{AB} + R_{AC} + R_{BC}} \nonumber \\ &= \frac{200\Omega \cdot 120\Omega}{200\Omega + 120\Omega + 680\Omega} \nonumber \\ &= 24.0\Omega \\ R_B &= \frac{R_{AB}R_{BC}}{R_{AB} + R_{AC} + R_{BC}} \nonumber \\ &= \frac{200\Omega \cdot 680\Omega}{200\Omega + 120\Omega + 680\Omega} \nonumber \\ &= 136\Omega \\ R_C &= \frac{R_{AC}R_{BC}}{R_{AB} + R_{AC} + R_{BC}} \nonumber \\ &= \frac{120\Omega \cdot 680\Omega}{200\Omega + 120\Omega + 680\Omega} \nonumber \\ &= 81.6\Omega \\ \end{align}

We can now collapse the rest of this circuit down by using the standard resistors-in-series and resistors-in-parallel simplifications:

\begin{align} R_{LL} &= 24\Omega + 820\Omega \nonumber \\ &= 844\Omega \\ R_{LR} &= 81.6\Omega + 180\Omega \nonumber \\ &= 262\Omega \\ \end{align}

We can now simplify the two bottom resistors which are in parallel:

\begin{align} R_{parallel} &= 844\Omega\ ||\ 262\Omega \nonumber \\ &= \frac{844\Omega \cdot 262\Omega}{844\Omega + 262\Omega} \nonumber \\ &= 200\Omega \\ \end{align}

And then we combine the last two resistors in series into just one resistor:

\begin{align} R_{single} &= 136\Omega + 200\Omega \nonumber \\ &= 336\Omega \\ \end{align}

Now it’s a simple task of $$I = \frac{V}{R}$$:

\begin{align} I &= \frac{V}{R} \\ &= \frac{12V}{336\Omega} \\ &= 35.7mA \end{align}

## Authors

### Geoffrey Hunter

Dude making stuff.